Data Basin
powered by

Northeast Conservation Planning Atlas

Get Started

  • About the Northeast CPA
  • About Data Basin
  • View Video Tutorials
  • Search Geographies or Keywords
  • Explore a Sample Map
  • Become a Member
  •  FAQs
  •  Support Services
  •  Glossary
  • Newsletter Archive

Browse

    Categories
  • Showcase
  • Galleries
  • Maps
  • Datasets
  • Groups
    Other CPAs
  • 2C1Forest Atlas
  • Gulf Coastal Plains
    and Ozarks LCC
  • Southeast Region
  • South Atlantic
  • External Resources

Create

  • Create a Map
  • Import a Dataset
  • Create a Group
  • Create a Gallery

Workspace

Your workspace is your dashboard for accessing and managing your content, bookmarks, and groups, as well as viewing messages and seeing your recently viewed content.

You need to be signed in to access your workspace.

Sign In    or    Sign Up
  • Northeast CPA |
  • Galleries |
  • Cave and Karst Resources

Cave and Karst Resources

Jul 19, 2016 (Last modified Nov 13, 2018)
Created by Northeast
Cave and Karst Resources

About

Cave-limited species display patchy and restricted distributions, but are challenging to study in-situ because of the difficulty of sampling. It is often unclear whether the observed distribution is a sampling artifact or a true restriction in range. Further, the drivers of the distribution could be local environmental conditions, such as cave humidity, or they could be associated with surface features that are surrogates for cave conditions. If surface features can be used to predict the distribution of important cave taxa, then conservation management goals can be more easily obtained. These GIS data represent the input and results of a spatial statistical model used to examine the hypothesis that the presence of major faunal groups of cave obligate species could be predicted based on features of the Earth surface. Georeferenced records of cave obligate amphipods, crayfish, fish, isopods, beetles, millipedes, pseudoscorpions, spiders, and springtails within the area of Appalachian Landscape Conservation Cooperative (LCC) in the eastern United States (Illinois to Virginia, and New York to Alabama) were assigned to 20 x 20 km grid cells. Habitat suitability for these faunal groups was modeled using logistic regression with twenty predictor variables within each grid cell, such as percent karst, soil features, temperature, precipitation, and elevation. The models successfully predicted the presence of a group greater than 65 percent of the time (mean=88 percent) for the presence of single grid cell endemics, and for all faunal groups except pseudoscorpions. The most common predictor variables were latitude, percent karst, and the standard deviation of the Topographic Position Index (TPI), a measure of landscape rugosity within each grid cell. The overall success of these models points to a number of important connections between the surface and cave environments, and some of these, especially soil features and topographic variability, suggest new research directions. These models should prove to be useful tools in predicting the presence of species in understudied areas.
The data within the gallery provides information and a summary of the cave/karst resources within the Appalachian LCC region. 
Tags
applcc, karst, lcc, baseflow, cave, biodiversity, soils, troglobiont, range, appalachian, species distribution model, topography, precipitation
Recommended by AppLCC_admin

This gallery is visible to everyone

Gallery contains
30 Datasets
Doctor, D.H., Young, J.A., Christman, M.C., Niemiller, M.L., Zigler, K.S., Weary, D.J., and Culver, D.C., 2016, GIS data for predicting the occurrence of cave-inhabiting fauna based on features of the Earth surface environment in the Appalachian Landscape Conservation Cooperative (LCC) Region: U.S. Geological Survey data release, http://dx.doi.org/10.5066/F76D5R2H.

About the Gallery Author

Northeast
with Science Applications, Northeast

Administration account for the Northeast Conservation Planning Atlas.

  • NORTHEAST
  • ABOUT DATA BASIN
  • TERMS OF USE
  • CONTACT US
© 2025 Conservation Biology Institute